Many-Facet Rasch Measurement
نویسنده
چکیده
This chapter provides an introductory overview of many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM). Broadly speaking, MFRM refers to a class of measurement models that extend the basic Rasch model by incorporating more variables (or facets) than the two that are typically included in a test (i.e., examinees and items), such as raters, scoring criteria, and tasks. Throughout the chapter, a sample of rating data taken from a writing performance assessment is used to illustrate the rationale of the MFRM approach and to describe the general methodological steps typically involved. These steps refer to identifying facets that are likely to be relevant in a particular assessment context, specifying a measurement model that is suited to incorporate each of these facets, and applying the model in order to account for each facet in the best possible way. The chapter focuses on the rater facet and on ways to deal with the perennial problem of rater variability. More specifically, the MFRM analysis of the sample data shows how to measure the severity (or leniency) of raters, to assess the degree of rater consistency, to correct examinee scores for rater severity differences, to examine the functioning of the rating scale, and to detect potential interactions between facets. Relevant statistical indicators are successively introduced as the sample data analysis proceeds. The final section deals with issues concerning the choice of an appropriate rating design to achieve the necessary connectedness in the data, the provision of feedback to raters, and applications of the MFRM approach to standard-setting procedures.
منابع مشابه
Rater Errors among Peer-Assessors: Applying the Many-Facet Rasch Measurement Model
In this study, the researcher used the many-facet Rasch measurement model (MFRM) to detect two pervasive rater errors among peer-assessors rating EFL essays. The researcher also compared the ratings of peer-assessors to those of teacher assessors to gain a clearer understanding of the ratings of peer-assessors. To that end, the researcher used a fully crossed design in which all peer-assessors ...
متن کاملAnalysis of rater severity on written expression exam using Many Faceted Rasch Measurement
This paper describes how a Many Faceted Rasch Measurement (MFRM) approach can be applied to performance assessment focusing on rater analysis. The article provides an introduction to MFRM, a description of MFRM analysis procedures, and an example to illustrate how to examine the effects of various sources of variability on test takers’ performance on a writing test by means of a MFRM analysis. ...
متن کاملDetecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: part I.
The purpose of this two-part paper is to introduce researchers to the many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) approach for detecting and measuring rater effects. The researcher will learn how to use the Facets (Linacre, 2001) computer program to study five effects: leniency/severity, central tendency, randomness, halo, and differential leniency/severity. Part 1 of the paper provides critical backgr...
متن کاملA Comparison of the Results of Many-Facet Rasch Analyses Based on Crossed and Judge Pair Designs
Citation: İlhan, M. (2016). A comparison of the results of many-facet Rasch analyses based on crossed and judge pair designs. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 579-601. 1 Correspondence to: Mustafa İlhan (PhD), Department of Primary Education, Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, Dicle University, Diyarbakır Turkey. Email: [email protected] Abstract The aim of this study was to c...
متن کامل